Ric,
There is a marked difference between "much like a new", "just as
well", and " better" as Thump put it. I, for one, cannot fathom how it could
ever be considered to be "better".
Greg Newell
Greg's Piano Forté
www.gregspianoforte.com
216-226-3791 (office)
216-470-8634 (mobile)
-----Original Message-----
From: pianotech-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf
Of Richard Brekne
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 1:43 AM
To: pianotech at ptg.org
Subject: Do you dry the ribs, along with the board, prior to gluing ?
Hi Greg
This is another one of those subjects that actually is quite fascinating
if we allow it to be so. I am reminded of a three way discussion a few
years back between Andre, Del and myself in which Del stated outright
that an old panel carefully removed and de-ribbed would sound and
perform much like a new panel if put together in an RC & S fashion.
This position was adjusted slightly to "it would sound and perform just
as well" or something to the affect I believe. Whatever compression
damage the wood has, evidently does not prevent it from being used
successfully as an RC & S panel.
Andre reacted a bit mentioning that his ears told him a brand new panel
would have a different kind of life...which Del agreed and I had to
wonder about a couple what seem like self contradictory statements built
into the argumentation.
All that aside... I think we all agreed in the end that the "old wood"
RC & S constructed panel would sound and perform nicely for many many
years. And it would have a character distinctive because the wood was
old... and exposed to years of compression set / damage if you will.
And if we accept that for what it is... then we are in a world of
"differences" and not one of "better or worse". The old panel can sound
and perform just as well... but with a voice of its own.
To what degree it can be used as a compression reliant board is... well
somewhat related I guess.... but another question.
Cheers
RicB
Thump and others,
Since we're all asking for proofs and hard facts here in the finer
points and minutia of soundboard technology would you please expound
on why
you feel that the old wood of the existing soundboard is more
resonant than
the new? It seems that if you're going to persist in this line of
thinking
then you must have good reasons for it, or is it just speculation? I
myself
am in the opposite camp wherein I believe that there is cellular
destruction
of the old wood and therefore due for replacement. My reasons follow
that of
which we've heard for years now on this list. This of course is
assuming a
CC board assembly. Your thoughts?
Greg Newell
Greg's Piano Forté
www.gregspianoforte.com
216-226-3791 (office)
216-470-8634 (mobile)
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC