I didnt really think so.... In that (this) case... percent of residual
crown in the present context is far from meaningless as a measure of
compression. I mean either it is... or it isnt.
Cheers
RicB
No, I'm not stating that.
David Love
So let me get this straight... You are stating outright, an RC &
S board
that in unloaded state has known values for rib dimensions and
radii and
panel compression of basically zipp diddly at glue up MC....
that in
this state... the application of a known degree of downward stress
(derived from residual crown and the above already knowns) has
no direct
relationship on how much panel compression results ?
Cheers
RicB
I can see that you don't. Percent is a meaningless measure
of compression in this case.
David Love
davidlovepianos at comcast.net
www.davidlovepianos.com
I dont see the relevance to the question about how much
compression gets imparted into the panel when a given RC&S
board gets subjected to enough downbearing to reduce its
crown to 25 % (or any given amount for that matter)of its
original height....which is the subject matter of the last
few posts on this thread.
Cheers
RicB
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC