I dont see the relevance to the question about how much compression gets
imparted into the panel when a given RC&S board gets subjected to enough
downbearing to reduce its crown to 25 % (or any given amount for that
matter) of its original height....which is the subject matter of the
last few posts on this thread.
Cheers
RicB
Percent residual crown doesn’t tell you much in a system that has
variable
radius control. If you start with a rib that has 10 mm of crown and
deflect
it 5 mm it has 50% left. If you start with a rib with 5 mm of crown and
deflect it 5 mm it has 0%. But they both have the same amount of
deflection
for the given load. Targeted amounts of crown in pure CC boards are
different because you are more limited to the amount of crowning you
can get
by virtue of panel compression. Like Ron, I would be interested to know
from those of you do pure CC assemblies what your stated goals are
in terms
of crown and what you can realistically hope to achieve along
specified rib
lengths. My own view is that it is this unpredictability (among other
things) that is a large part of the problem with pure CC boards.
David Love
davidlovepianos at comcast.net
www.davidlovepianos.com
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC