Looking at the photos sent with your first post on this subject, they were clear enough to see that the maple surface of the bridge in your photograph were in what looked to be pretty good shape compared to what I have seen. I see deep crush marks around the string impressions on my customers pianos, particularly near the edge of the step to the agraffe where it loses further support. I think you are underestimating how much the wood has visibly given way to the string pressure in the pianos I have seen that are particularly false. You may be surprised, but I am not. I'm not inclined to believe that the problem lies with the agraffes or at the capo bar, given that the falseness is so widely distributed and extends down into the area where there are agraffes at the front as well. This falseness is exhibited in almost every note throughout the area of the bridge where the agraffes are used, to a greater or lesser degree. It is the kind of sound you get when the string energy is bleeding past a termination - not a buzzing but strong false beats of varying beat rates, and it will vary from note to note in beat speed and intensity. Also, your bridge looks slightly different than what I have seen. My customers pianos have the area where the flat top of the bridge angles down to the agraffe in a more rounded configuration, rather than what appears to be an angled flat surface in your photograph. Agraffe deterioration? I suppose it is possible, but what about this design would cause widespread wear of the agraffe? The deflection angle does not appear to be any greater than we see between agraffe and string rest at the other end of the speaking length. Will -----Original Message----- From: pianotech-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of David Love Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 8:07 PM To: pianotech at ptg.org Subject: Re: [pianotech] Bridge agraffes FYI I would be surprised if the area behind the aggraffe (hitch pin side) was the source of falseness. Unless the aggraffe itself had deteriorated (which it well might have) I don't think any small angle change resulting from some crushed wood would be the source of poor termination. The capo section might well be a source (see attached photo). David Love www.davidlovepianos.com -----Original Message----- From: pianotech-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of Encore Pianos Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 4:20 PM To: pianotech at ptg.org Subject: Re: [pianotech] Bridge agraffes FYI I have a couple of these in my service presently here in New Hampshire, and have had others in the past. These bridges probably sounded pretty good in 1925 when they were new, but as they age, they can become insanely, incredibly false. This I would attribute to the deterioration of the bearing surface of the maple just behind the agraffe where the string presses into it. The strings literally crush the surface reducing the angle of deflection of the string as it exits the back of the agraffe, and an insecure termination and the falseness is the result. I have heard these problems on a number of these agraffed sohmers, mostly the (stupid) cupid grands. So I attribute that to a flaw of the design rather than an isolated incident. Living in New England, I am in a harsh environment for pianos with dry winters and humid summers, so perhaps I see more deterioration than you do, in your more benign environment. Will Truitt
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC