On 11/29/2012 5:32 PM, Joseph Garrett wrote: > Ron said: > "Look it up. It'll be good experience for you." > Ron, > Oooo I did and it made me all wet and gooey! See, that didn't hurt so bad, did it? > However, to the main subject, I prefer "Ivorine" aka "Pyralin". The problem > with "moulded" is that it implies that all keys are the same and that stuff > will be better and fit all keys. It doesn't imply anything like that to me. The pre-shaped key top is, however, a lot less wasteful than the rectangular pyralin and easier on the folks who don't own powered key machines. >It isn't and doesn't, imo. You don't need an opinion to know that all keys aren't the same, and that the pre-shaped key tops don't perfectly fit everything without doing some work. All you have to do is look to see it's a fact. But then no one has ever claimed otherwise that I'm aware of. >And, it makes more work in the end. How? If it's because the shaped tops are thicker and you need to plane the key down, you might find, like most of us, that the thicker top doesn't leave a rippled top surface like the thinner pyralin - especially if it's solvent bonded to the key. > Too thick and if scratched, is a bear to buff out w/o destroying the darned > stuff. Pyralin is as soft or softer than the shaped tops I've used. Try not scratching them instead. > That's my take on the stuff. Of course it is. > I know there are many who use it with reasonable success. If given a choice > I'd rather have some Plexiglass tops, as they used in Europe for quite a > few years. (Don't know if they still do.) Great stuff imo. More tricky to > trim for sure, but bullet proof from then on. Then why don't you buy opaque white plexiglass sheet and use that? Ron N
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC