Right on Ron Terry Beckingham At 10:38 AM 5/31/2012 -0500, you wrote: >On 5/31/2012 9:55 AM, Encore Pianos wrote: >>I'll try to make my point simply. I think a study committee should be >>formed to seek a good quality replacement for both Pianotech and the Higher >>Logic program. > >This is the very best attitude they could hope for. It makes it dead easy >for them to justify dumping Mailman. They bought HL on their own authority >and dumped it on us without consideration or recourse, because they wanted >it. That won't change until they decide it was a mistake from their own >perspective and by their own criteria. > > >>Pianotech is very long in the tooth and can't be expected to >>last forever. > >So they keep telling us over and over and over. It seems to be working >because now you're telling us the same thing over and over and over, >supporting their position in their minds. > >This is, yet again, why I originally suggested and continue to suggest >that HL be made to, in ADDITION to any other "features" it has that may >actually work, at LEAST replicate all the functions of the Mailman list. >We would lose nothing in functionality, and Mailman could go. What I don't >understand is this psychotic administrative group reaction to suggesting >that HL should be made to at least meet the functionality of Mailman. The >severe negative reaction to the suggestion is far out of proportion to the >suggestion itself, which I considered the only sensible approach from the >beginning. > >Ron N
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC