[pianotech] phenomana - experiment.

[dmporritt at gmail.com]

David:

That note-by-note sameness available with ETD use can be very important in recording studios where a segment might be inserted in after the main session. Most recordings now have lots of "edits" inserted at a later date and the tuning really needs to be the same. 

dp
Sent from my BlackBerry®

-----Original Message-----
From: "David Love" <davidlovepianos at comcast.net>
Sender: pianotech-bounces at ptg.org
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 06:24:41 
To: <pianotech at ptg.org>
Reply-To: pianotech at ptg.org
Subject: Re: [pianotech] phenomana - experiment.

And I would say your statement is false.  Ed Foote describe very well how a
calculated tuning can be memorized, refined and duplicated using an ETD.
For all practical purposes, that tuning will be able to repeated as
precisely as one is able to control the tuning lever.  Certainly one can
recreate an acceptable, artistic and successful tuning aurally on the same
piano on repeated tunings but the likelihood of actual note for note pitch
variability will be much greater with the aural tuning.  I don't think
that's that hard to fathom nor a great mystery.  

David Love
www.davidlovepianos.com


-----Original Message-----
From: pianotech-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf
Of Kent Swafford
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2012 4:57 AM
To: pianotech at ptg.org
Subject: Re: [pianotech] phenomana - experiment.


On May 15, 2012, at 6:22 PM, Duaine Hechler wrote:

> Whereas, an ETD tuner, CAN create the EXACT same tuning over, and over,
and over, and over, etc.


This statement is false.

You overestimate the stability of piano tone. Tunings of the same piano vary
from one to the next, regardless of how they are accomplished.=