Ron N wrote:On 5/15/2012 9:53 AM, Ron Koval wrote: > Let me create a custom tuning style that should replicate a master > tuning - Why? I still need a strictly aural "as refined as possible" tuning that the master tuning would supply. *******************That's why David needs to be in the mix - if he can verify that the Verituner "gets there" to his satisfaction, then the data stream produced would be assumed to be valid. *******************> If we can make this work, it bypasses needing to actually tune the > piano, just step through the notes A0-C7 to gather the inharmonicity > data and let the Verituner calculate... Shouldn't take more than 10 > minutes or so! No, if you're going to try to fake the data, count me out. The whole point is a sampling of real world results. This is exactly why I do my own research when I can, and why I haven't brought this up until now, as I've wondered about this for some years. If we can't do it right, let's just not do it at all. Ron N****************Not trying to fake data. If the Verituner calculates a tuning that whenplaced on a piano equals a master tuning (not sure anyone's tried yet -there was one report of a tech using a custom style he developed in the RPT test and the examiner mentioned that it was the closest ever seen to the master tuning -within the tuning resolution.) then it should be possible to skip the tuning step, whichintroduces both stability and measurement errors into the process...Ron Kovalchicagoland -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/20120515/d0167e81/attachment.htm>
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC