Dear Norman,
Thank you for the update. As you are no doubt aware, the danger of a
posting such as this, as well intentioned as it is, is its capacity
to rekindle the inflammatory list-related conversations, just when
they were being supplanted by more piano-centered
discussions. Ideally, there would be room for both. My intention,
In commenting on your message, is simply to clarify what, in my view,
seem to be some misconceptions.
At 09:11 PM 1/11/2012, Norman Cantrell wrote:
>Dear List
>
>Some have expressed concern regarding a general lack of information
>about progress on the Higher Logic site.
In fact, in posting your update to this list - pianotech at ptg.org - I
don't think your description quite captures the essence of the
expressed concerns, which are less about progress with the HL site
than a fundamental re-thinking of the objectives of the whole
project. Website list users who are looking for 'improvements' are
more likely to be found on the web-based Pianotech, the UserGroup
list (also the website), or PTG-L.
>We wanted to let you know that during the early part of December PTG
>sent four representatives to Washington, DC for a Higher Logic
>Symposium. Those attending were Barbara Cassaday and Kathy Maxwell
>from the Home Office along with Phil Bondi and Paul Brown who have
>both served on the Electronic Communications Committee and currently
>serve as Regional Vice Presidents on the PTG Board of
>Directors. The symposium was formatted similar to a PTG convention
>with several different class topics offered. Our group split up and
>attended classes that interested them and this allowed the group to
>cover a broad range of topics. Each has provided a written report
>after returning home from the symposium. These reports will all be
>reviewed at the upcoming Mid Year Board meeting January 30 through
>February 1, 2012.
In the spirit of transparency, when, and how much of that information
would be subsequently made available to the membership? What
'classes' did our people attend? Does the Electronic Communications
Committee have any role in these considerations?
>We continue to look at ways to improve the new website. Our goal is
>to improve the discussion groups, increase the overall speed to
>load and improve the user experience.
Frankly, I'm not sure what any of this means? "Improve discussion
groups" in what way, other than speed and rationality of options and
process? Is the nature of the conversation itself needing of improvement?
>In the mean time the Pianotech list will continue to operate but
>there are challenges to maintaining the servers which we foresee as
>having limitations.
It's probable that many of us would find a thoroughly technical
description of these challenges difficult to fully understand, and
yet, however unintentionally it may be, sweeping generalizations like
the one above end up generating more un-ease than they do to dispel
it. I have made a suggestion more than once, of late. How much
would it cost to transcribe the proceedings of the pianotech meeting
that took place this past summer at the convention? Can we impose
upon a cross section of those who have been involved - Ron Berry or
even Andy Rudoff (pay him even) to objectively summarize the
situation, so that any discussion going forth is based on
facts? {Even Norman's response to Duaine"s post:
>Keeping all this going is part of the challenge to which I referred.
leaves a certain vagueness. Yes, it is a challenge, but is it
do-able, or, if not (in technical and economic terms), is the current
offering the best we can hope for to replace it?
In the long term, I see no positive purpose in having two 'pianotech'
lists, however, at the moment, if nothing else, this list provides an
objective vantage point from which it is possible to examine the what
is currently being proposed, and to remind us that there might be
other, alternative life-forms out there.
Thanks again -
David Skolnik
Hastings on Hudson, NY
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/20120111/4166c3bd/attachment.htm>
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC