On 12/20/2012 1:03 PM, David Love wrote: > First, having a cut-off or no cut-off is really of no consequence in terms > of load bearing capacity. A longer rib will have a larger cross section to > compensate for its length. Simple enough. The cutoff makes the rib effectively stiffer while it actually reduces the mass of the rib. A smaller cross section, shorter, lighter rib with a cutoff will support the weight of a bigger, heavier, longer rib without one. Similar strength with less material. Simple. >A cut-off, especially a large > one, does have acoustic consequences but that is something different and I'm > willing to call that a matter of taste for the time being. That's big of you, but we're talking about real physical structure here rather than your subjective evaluation of tonal consequences, which I've already read at great length. > As I mentioned, I'm not sure I want to delve into all the > details of that at this point--not quite ready to give it all up. I think most of your secrets are safe. So let's try a rib out of a S&S B, so we'll have something from some semblance of the real world though that won't affect the math much. I've got a rib of 1090 mm length, which my addition of a cutoff reduced to 770mm. I added ribs to the original, so in this case the string load on this rib would come to about 25 lbs at the 1° bearing you like. The original, having fewer ribs, would have a bigger load on this rib, but this will serve for illustration. Let's see what the deflections are. With a 25 lb load, and a 770mm long rib: 20mm wide, and 26mm tall deflects 3.34mm 18mm wide, and 24mm tall deflects 4.71mm 16mm wide, and 25mm tall deflects 6.88mm Crown heights 770mm rib: @12M= 6.18 @9M= 8.24 @7.5M= 9.89 What you have left in crown depends on what you started with. With a 25 lb load, and the original 1090mm long rib: 20mm wide, and 26mm tall deflects 9.46mm 18mm wide, and 24mm tall deflects 13.37mm 16mm wide, and 25mm tall deflects 19.52mm Without the cutoff, the long rib deflects about three times what the shortened one does. Crown heights 1090mm rib: @16M= 9.28mm @12M= 12.38mm So with the cutoff, you can get about 50% deflection (if that's your goal) any number of ways by matching crown height from different radii with rib dimensions. But half of an arbitrary radius is a useless measure without some real indicator of stiffness, and these ribs are of considerably different stiffness. That's what spring rate is for. Once you make a map of what you'd like to see in rib stiffness in different parts of the scale, the crowns and deflections can be worked out to make it work. The stiffness is what makes it work, not the remaining percentage of an arbitrary crown. I'd probably size the rib at 770mm x 20W x 26H, and a 9M radius. Without another chorus of the dangers inherent in making ribs too stiff, what numbers would you put on the rib dimensions, showing the figures from your deflection formula. I expect you'd use the original length, right? Ron N
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC