[pianotech] were they idots?

tnrwim at aol.com tnrwim at aol.com
Wed Aug 8 23:08:23 MDT 2012




>But
> maybe I should just say no to Acrosonics.
> Wim

Nah, just quit taking the flippin' fall boards out!

Ron N




 Except when you have to repair a key. 

Wim



-----Original Message-----
From: Ron Nossaman <rnossaman at cox.net>
To: pianotech <pianotech at ptg.org>
Sent: Wed, Aug 8, 2012 7:04 pm
Subject: Re: [pianotech] were they idots?


On 8/8/2012 10:51 PM, tnrwim at aol.com wrote:
> This has probably been discussed to death, but I wonder what went
> through the engineers' heads when they developed the Baldwin Acrosonic
> fallboard mechanisms.

Those are Eitherseers! You can either see the keys, or the hammers, but 
not both at the same time. They weren't idiots. Except for being so 
huge, I think it's a pretty clever mechanism, but they did have a 
definite mean streak.


>But
> maybe I should just say no to Acrosonics.
> Wim

Nah, just quit taking the flippin' fall boards out!

Ron N

 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/20120809/a8e8f707/attachment.htm>


More information about the pianotech mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC