Old List, Phil Bondi has been serving, as a volunteer, as liason with the software vendor for the new forum. He is responsible to report bugs and other problems to the vendor, and to pass instructions, help, and bug-fix status reports back to the users. Since we haven't heard from him for a while, I am copying him on this message, so that he can read the entire thread on the old pianotech and respond with an update on scheduled bug fixes and improvements. Mike On 6/29/2011 5:31 AM, david at piano.plus.com wrote: >> In many ways Pianotech had become a better resource than the Journal - >> witness how many articles in the Journal have been lifted from > Pianotech. > > Will, you make a highly significant point here, I feel (and everyone > else's observations are powerful too). > > I very much enjoy getting the Journal. But it doesn't take me long to read > through each issue. Some excellent tips, some complex things to look back > at later, and so on. > > But the Journal affords nothing LIKE the resource that this List has > constituted for years. If I have a query about something, I can draw on > the collective vast experience of all here, and almost always there are > immediate and very helpful responses. Plus, this list has had over the > years a feeling of "community" that the Journal can't really offer. > > I have been trying out the new Forum. I have not had any real difficulties > in posting to it and in uploading pictures (and it has the advantage of > accepting much larger files). > > But it is clear that no general move towards the new Forum system is > taking place. It seems to have a relatively small number of dedicated > regular contributors. The quality of the information and discussion posted > is fine, just as it is here. But the QUANTITY is very sadly lacking. > > Now, there has to be a reason, or several reasons, why we have not all > migrated quite naturally to the new system. Various things seem to be > emerging, from posts here in this thread. One is that people find it > harder or less friendly to ACCESS for reading. Another is that people find > it harder or less friendly to POST TO. Another is that it seems to be > hader to SEND PHOTOS. > > There is the horrible spectre of a self-fulfilling prophecy happening with > the new Forum: "I don't post there because nobody posts there", morphing > into Council saying "We don't need a Forum - nobody uses it anyway". > > The collective knowledge, experience and goodwill on all things piano > that comprises this list, and has done so since the mid 1990s, is FAR too > good and important a resource to let die by attrition. > > I have not over the years become much involved in other Forums such as > pianoworld, because time is limited and I like the closeness and technical > expertise of this List community. > > Is it the feeling of others, that we simply will not, even given time, be > able to translate the closeness and technical expertise and immediacy of > this community, to the new Forum? If so, and volunteer time is > unavailable to maintain this List, why not use the money for the new > Forum, to PAY someone to maintain this list instead? > > I have been of the view that perhaps in time as more migrate across, the > new Forum would begin to feel more like this List. Do others feel that > that isn't so, even if everyone moves across, or because people simply > WON'T move across but will give up instead? > > We cannot let this invaluable resource simply die out. > > Best regards, > > David. > > >
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC