Right. The PTG provides and maintains the list, emphasizing my point. Why should non-members have a say in the disposition of the list? It doesn't mean their contributions are not worthwhile, but I just can't understand why organizational decisions should be directed by those outside the organization. Can you suggest a logical reason it should be so? WRM On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Ron Koval <drwoodwind at hotmail.com> wrote: > > >From William R Monroe: > <snip>I'm just growing weary of all the complaints from folks who refuse > to be on PTG-L<snip> > Interesting take on the issue of communication to the people on the list > about whenthe list will be killed. > > In case you forgot: (from "about this list") > The "pianotech" list, provided as a community service by the Piano > Technicians Guild, is a forum for piano technicians. The list resides on > the PTG server and is maintained by the PTG, but the PTG does not control > the content in any way. The "pianotech" list is an open list, allowing > anyone to subscribe or submit posts. > The same cannot be said about PTG-L(and I AM subscribed to that list - > there are others on pianotech that can't) > Ron Koval > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/20111212/e0581151/attachment.htm>
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC