On 9/12/2010 8:47 PM, PAULREVENKOJONES at aol.com wrote: > "Status" is originally a Latin noun and in Latin it declines as a u-stem > noun. So in Latin, the plural form of "status" is also "status". > Paul > In a message dated 9/12/2010 3:30:48 P.M. Central Daylight Time, > JD at Pianomaker.co.uk writes: > > At 14:42 -0500 12/9/10, Ron Nossaman wrote: > > >>Who?! Is that Quechua or Inuit? How do you pronounce it? > > > >Neither. It's the plural of status (invented just for Joe). Radius < > >radii, status < statii. <G> > > Ah well, for a serial offender like Joe it will do fine, but the > murder of a language is a crime even if it is already dead, and let > it be known the plural of status would be status if it were ever used. > > JD Yea, yea, I know. It's a JOKE, as described, intended to abuse Joe, who gets it. If it would behoove someone to have done something, would they no have been behiven by having complied? No, no, don't answer that. Ron N
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC