On Mar 8, 2009, at 6:43 AM, Richard Brekne wrote: > Even if you could realistically patent any aural approach, let alone > one that has as much prior discussion, it would be impossible to > control and not worth the effort and cost to patent to begin with. This is "old news" and is not currently at issue. > I dont have his ETD, So, why do you have so much to say about my reports regarding this software, if you have no actual experience using it? 'PureTuner is more than just a simple implementation of 19 tone to the pure duodecime equal temperament. > I think it was unfortunate that there has been so much use of the > word "magic" tied to the whole thing. It's got nothing to do with > magic and the association was/is I think counter productive at best The original point, despite your misreading of it, remains that new technology can seem indistinguishable from magic. If you disagree with that general truth, then please take it up with Arthur C. Clarke, who made the statement. It is annoying that you continue to argue against a point that was never made. Perhaps if you had actually used the software, you would understand a bit more about the contribution that it appears to bring to our field. Thanks for your interest. Kent
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC