Hi folks.
I sat on this one for a couple days, not knowing whether to respond or
not, knowing that my usual response always gets met with... well with
what it usually gets met with... so I'll just ask you all a question I'd
like your thoughts on... read the quote from Ron O first.
"Why don't I build them for all of the pianos we do? It took me a
week to build the test set on the lathe with my milling attachment.
I understand the Steinway rep here (who is also a technician)
criticised the parts because they weren't factory standard - amazing
stuff. This is how pianos have been stuck-in-a-rut for a 100 years.
The factory that dominates the others doesn't give a damn about the
craft, just the politics. So nothing changes."
Ron O.
The question I'd like to ask you is ... ok... so what if Steinway went
broke tomorrow and had to close its doors once and for all ? Do you, any
of you think that the situation Ron and others so often express so much
frustration about would really change ? And if so for how long ?
It seems to me that, whilst I understand the frustration expressed time
and time over again, it seems to me that the wrong animal is being
blamed. I would think that if it wasn't Steinway which dominants so much
of what is accepted piano-wise, that some other factory would. That this
is part of human nature... like it or not... for better or for worse. A
collapse of such a dominant force might result in some period of lots of
dynamics in the industry... also for better and for worse... but that
period would soon give way to the establishment of some new dominant
force who relies on all the same kinds of mechanisms for survival as
Steinway does today... with all the inherent frustrations of the kind
expressed above that has been expressed so often. Seems to me we are
stuck with that as long as we remain the animal we are today. Or what ?
Cheers
RicB
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC