On Feb 27, 2009, at 4:41 PM, A440A at aol.com wrote: > So, if I am regulating for the highest level, I am going to split > the > error and allow blow and keydip to both vary slightly so that > aftertouch remains > consistant. It feels better than if I allow dip to take up all the > inequalities of the action. Ed, I wrote ... quote: Give any decent instrument a really good and precise key dip and regulation and the result will almost always be very nice and very satisfying. Aftertouch is the last regulation procedure and I like that the most. because it shows whether I have done a thorough regulation, or not. Aftertouch also shows that in some places the action is willing to 'give more', and in other places less. The beauty of this is that it all depends on the making of a superb key dip/key frame regulation, which I consider an art in itself. unquote Which means that making a proper aftertouch is obvious. friendly greetings from André Oorebeek Antoni van Leeuwenhoekweg 15 1401 VW, Bussum the Netherlands tel : +31 35 6975840 gsm : +31 652 388008 www.concertpianoservice.nl "where Music is, no harm can be" -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/pianotech_ptg.org/attachments/20090227/8e7d9cb0/attachment-0001.html>
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC