[pianotech] Fwd: Erwins key dip gauge

Richard Brekne ricb at pianostemmer.no
Fri Feb 27 07:09:34 PST 2009


Hi, comment below:

    Referent to:
    http://ptg.org/pipermail/pianotech_ptg.org/2009-February/004656.html
    by David Love

I agree entirely with this approach, tho slightly different in actual 
method.  Essential to this is as David points out a perfectly regulated 
action. The basic relationships between blow distance, let off, and key 
dip along with the unavoidable small variances in action parts dictate 
that if an even after touch is to be acquired then one of the three will 
have to float to some small degree. Of these three it is my experience 
that key dip is the obvious choice. First and foremost because no matter 
what gauge you use to set key dip... no matter how you go about it... 
you will never ever get it truly <<perfect>>.  Any given other 
technician will be able to find this and that here and there to 
re-adjust, and pianists simply do not react to the variances in key dip 
required for a dead even after touch given an otherwise perfectly 
regulated action. Quite the opposite really... they WILL react to after 
touch unevenness.

As David points out... after touch is the most important aspect of 
setting key dip.  I'd add that all other things being done well, any 
unevenness in resultant key dip will be at least as insignificant as the 
most precise attempt at setting dip to exactly 10.0001 mm (or whatever 
your gauge is).

I start with a rough 10 mm dip... go about as good a regulation as I 
can, then circle back to key dip for after touch, finishing with a 
refinement of drop as that can change with changes in key dip.

Cheers
RicB




More information about the pianotech mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC