Dang, you got it! Closer to my point anyway. If I ever had a point. P In a message dated 8/28/2009 9:56:29 P.M. Central Daylight Time, davidlovepianos at comcast.net writes: I meant can’t achieve immediate stability after a radical pitch change. I thought that was what we were talking about. Damn that language thing again. David Love www.davidlovepianos.com From: pianotech-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of PAULREVENKOJONES at aol.com Sent: Friday, August 28, 2009 5:55 PM To: pianotech at ptg.org Subject: Re: [pianotech] PR follow up In a message dated 8/28/2009 7:49:28 P.M. Central Daylight Time, davidlovepianos at comcast.net writes: I don’t think they offer a reason that the piano can’t achieve stability. David: I have never said in any word I've written that the piano can't achieve stability, or some modicum of it. I have only questioned how much stability, and what level of claim are we going to make after a radical pitch alteration to a level of stability which may or may not be defined as adequate, acceptable, or fine. Sheesh. Cheers, P ____________________________________ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/pianotech.php/attachments/20090828/b62586ae/attachment.htm>
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC