[pianotech] Vertical Touchweight

Jeff Deutschle oaronshoulder at gmail.com
Tue Aug 11 11:28:25 MDT 2009


Thanks for mentioning the other posts and your results. I will
definitely keeps this in mind.

On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Floyd Gadd<fg at floydgadd.com> wrote:
> List,
>
> I continue to fuss with the touch responsiveness of my 41"
> Nordheimer/Heintzman console (1966).  After moving forward from reweighting
> the keys to some final regulating, I remained unsatisfied with my results.
> The question of how to deal with the influence of the hammer return springs
> was eluding me.
>
> I found a post in the archives by Stephen Schell (November 18, 1996) under
> the title "Small vertical key flop". He recommended weighting the keys to an
> upweight target of 15 grams, with the hammer held out of the way.
> Downweight was then set by regulating the hammer return spring.
>
> I've tried this on a sample, and it makes a tremendous difference.  Key
> return is no longer dependent on either the damper spring or the hammer
> return spring.  Downweight is at 46 and upweight is at 35.  This is
> consistent with the small Yamaha upright I am using as a basis for
> comparison.  And the Yamaha upright has an upweight of something more than
> 16 grams with the hammer taken out of the equation.
>
> So now I need to reweight my keys again, adding more weight behind the
> balance rail, and weakening my hammer springs.
>
> Who was it on this list that said recently that any job worth doing is worth
> doing over?
>
> Floyd Gadd
> Manitoba Chapter
>
>



-- 
Regards,
Jeff Deutschle

Please address replies to the List. Do not E-mail me privately. Thank You.


More information about the pianotech mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC