Ron.
I think this is exactly in line with what I said. I am very well
acquainted with what the Verituner does and doesn't. Indeed, two months
before its release I went on record complaining about the single partial
approach and got snowed on by a few folks for thinking it was even
possible to do a multi-partial ETD. It does not listen to the note to be
tuned before deciding its target, which was central to the point I made
about ETD's not being able (at present) to find any sweet spot. The
other central moment is the degree of para inharmonicity at this level
of accuracy. It needs to be taken into account to find any sweet
spot....which implies direct comparison of both notes simultaneously....
at the very least. That is precisely what ear tuners... especially
those disciples of Smith do that an ETD doesn't.
Cheers
RicB
You may want to revisit your research into the Verituner. While not
listening to the ENTIRE spectrum of at least two different notes, it
does use the information from a good number of partials to make
tuning target placement choices. Combined with a thoughtful use of
the custom style function, the technician can dictate which two or
more notes are to be compared when calculating the tuning for each
specific note. I've advocated a two-pass tuning for a number of
years to allow the machine to have all of the inharmonicity data
during the fine tuning pass. The Verituner really is different from
the rest in that respect. The result is NOT a smooth curve tuning
at any single partial level.
Ron Koval
Chicagoland
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC