reducing hammer weight

[Garret Traylor]

What? Less weight = more inertia?

Kindest Regards,

Garret 

---

From: pianotech-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf
Of Paul T Williams
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 10:53 AM
To: Pianotech List
Subject: Re: reducing hammer weight

 


I doubt the holes were drilled to lessen weight. Rather, more inertia is put
forward of the shank, hence improving power and tone. 

Paul 





"Fenton Murray" <fmurray at cruzio.com> 
Sent by: pianotech-bounces at ptg.org 

09/09/2008 12:46 AM 


Please respond to
Pianotech List <pianotech at ptg.org>


To

"Pianotech List" <pianotech at ptg.org> 


cc

	

Subject

Re: reducing hammer weight

 

		




Just that was done on this original set of hammers on this Steinway Upright 
from 1878. The top couple of octaves in the treble were drilled, my guess 
weight was not the issue, but rather trying to improve the tone. First time 
I have seen this, then 2 days later I see the post.
Fenton
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <A440A at aol.com>
To: <pianotech at ptg.org>
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 5:20 PM
Subject: Re: reducing hammer weight


> :
>
> << I've a set of hammers that I'd like to reduce the weight on, but I'm
> pleased
>
> with the shape, width, etc., of them.  What would you do?? >>
>
> I would take a scrap piece of wood like the molding, weigh it, and then 
> drill
> a hole and weigh it again.  I think you will find a negligible difference.
> Regards,
> Ed Foote RPT
> http://www.uk-piano.org/edfoote/index.html
> www.uk-piano.org/edfoote/well_tempered_piano.html
> <BR><BR><BR>**************<BR>Psssst...Have you heard the news? There's a
> new fashion blog, plus the latest fall trends and hair styles at
> StyleList.com.<BR> 
> (http://www.stylelist.com/trends?ncid=aolsty00050000000014)</HTML>
>
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/20080909/eb6542d9/attachment.html