Uh...by using assist springs. Seems fairly clear.
David Love
davidlovepianos at comcast.net
www.davidlovepianos.com
Greetings.
On assist springs, I think they can make a bad action better by
allowing the removal of excess key lead, not the right way to fix
things. But, fooling around with these things I was able to 'feel'
the same action with different amounts of key lead, . An old 550
Kawai had a nice action until I unhooked the assist springs and
added lead.
Fenton
Curious as to how you got "an action with the same hammers, ratio, and
BW, but different leading". If you change the leading, then you change
the BW. That is to say unless you changed the leading but kept the FW
constant.
This said. Several of these posts seem to skirt the main issue involved
here, namely that if your hammer strike weight is too high for your
ratio, then the action is simply going to feel heavy in some sense or
another no matter what you do. Assist springs wont really change that
under play nearly as much as some will have it. Indeed, I've gotten to
the point where instead of feeling like I need some kind of assist
mechanism to tweek or fine tune BW, I'd rather use a basic stanwood
approach and add a diagnostic to tweek the ratio key to key for more
uniform touch. Then too is the point that adjustable touch weight
schemes in the end address the static side of the equation more then the
dynamic. To what degree is another discussion.
Cheers
RicB
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC