The piano world is replete with living (and dead) examples of the unpredictability of the compression crowning method. Anyone who has paid attention has heard the evidence. NY Steinway pianos are a great source for this study especially if you take the "different personalities" euphemism as a statement to the effect that each piece of wood will respond differently to their own particular method. This is not to be read as a criticism of their choice, necessarily. It is their choice and there are examples where it's produced a very musical outcome. While variations in rib strength do occur they can be easily tested prior to gluing them up as some rebuilders do. The purpose of the laminated rib is also to create a more uniform MOE from rib to rib by mixing lots. I don't want to discourage anyone, though. I will be on the sidelines cheering anyone who wants to embark on a scientific study to prove the true limited variability of the compression of spruce in the compression crowning method. You will need a skilled grant writer though as the costs will be high, too high for me and, unfortunately, I'm not in a position to donate any money to the cause--at least not until the kids are out of college. David Love davidlovepianos at comcast.net www.davidlovepianos.com ... As far as the claim that the degree of unpredictability being proportional to the degree with which the assembly is reliant on compression.... where is the study that supports this ? Proportional has very a specific meaning when used thus. Strikes me right off that given the fact that the rib is just as likely to show wide variability in its strength properties... particularly bending strengths... such a claim is taken out of thin air. JMMV
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC