Del, It looks like the grain angle on your board is really different than the original. If it is, how do you determine what grain angle to use? Why do you float the end of the soundboard (isn't this for more flexibility?) and then you turn around and add a veneer to stiffen it and add impedence? These seem antithetical. What am I misunderstanding? Bob Hull --- Delwin D Fandrich <fandrich at pianobuilders.com> wrote: > > > > _____ > > From: pianotech-bounces at ptg.org > [mailto:pianotech-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of > Erwinspiano at aol.com > Sent: March 30, 2007 10:06 PM > To: pianotech at ptg.org > Subject: Steinway B Scale Conversion > > > > My Colleagues > ... > My thanks to all bellyheads who have shared the > bizzarro ideas over the > years. These things work & pan out in real life. If > any one would like to come > & play it give a call. > Dale Erwin > > > > Yes, they do, don't they. Below (and attached at > higher resolution) is a picture > of another approach to the same problem. This one > uses seven bi-chords on the > transition bridge (which is what I normally > recommend for these scales). > > This piano also got a floating bass section. The > maple veneer on the top and > bottom of the soundboard is for stiffness (i.e., > impedance) control. This also > works and pans out in real life. > > Regards, > > Del > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Now that's room service! Choose from over 150,000 hotels in 45,000 destinations on Yahoo! Travel to find your fit. http://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC