Double-blind testing sounds kind of scientific. :-) My personal experience is that with two fine pianos from the same piano maker, one tuned to ET and the other to a mild HT, the one with the HT always "plays better", "has a much better tone" "is more responsive" .... yada yada yada. I usually don't dis-abuse piano professors and concert artists of their notions. Andrew Anderson At 02:51 AM 3/26/2007, you wrote: >Hi Ed, > >Have any of your challenges of ET vs HT been done with double blind testing? > >At 08:56 AM 3/26/2007 EDT, you wrote: > > > I do have a simple challenge: with two identical pianos, allow me to > >tune one and anybody else tune the other in ET,(I don't care if it is the >best > >tuner from any of the makers) and then compare any kind of music on both of > >them. I have done this repeatedly and the overwhelming majority of >listeners > >have preferred the non-ET piano. Strict equal just doesn't hold up in >side by > >side comparisons and a growing number of tuners are finding that out. > >Regards, > > > > > >Ed Foote RPT >Regards, >Don Rose, B.Mus., A.M.U.S., A.MUS., R.P.T. >Non calor sed umor est qui nobis incommodat > >mailto:pianotuna at yahoo.com http://us.geocities.com/drpt1948/ > >3004 Grant Rd. REGINA, SK, S4S 5G7 >306-539-0716 or 1-888-29t-uner
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC