I've helped rebuild a Bush & Lane upright years ago. They CAN be a great sounding instrument! Avery On 6/11/07, J Patrick Draine <jpdraine at gmail.com> wrote: > > I would not put much credence in the descriptions you'll find in the > "Bluebook of Pianos." The first quoted passage is probably from some > ad copy put out by B&L back in the day. > That said, I don't have any bad words to say about Bush & Lane. Those > that I have serviced were quite old and worn out, and the owners had > no intention to rebuild ("just tune please, fix the sticky keys"). > Good luck, > Patrick > > On 6/11/07, stuka at mindspring.com <stuka at mindspring.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I'm seeing good things on the internet about about Bush and Lane > instruments, such as "The Bush & Lane grand is unique for the volume and > purity of its tone and tile durable character of its construction. It is > doubtful whether the sympathetic tone possessed by the smallest of the Bush > & Lane Grands has been surpassed in any other grand of its size. The > wonderful power and charming sweetness of tone of the entire line of Bush & > Lane grands has been enthusiastically acclaimed by all musicians who have > played them." from the Bluebook of Pianos, and on sellers claim that "Most > piano technicians perk up when you mention the name "Bush & Lane"! > Considered equal or superior to Steinway pianos from the same period, this > company has been somewhat forgotten except by those "in the know"". I'm > going to look at a 6' Bush and Lane shortly, is this sales pitch I cited in > the ballpark, or just hype? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Matt > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/20070611/d852002d/attachment.html
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC