Whats discriminatory about it? Just the facts, ma'am. I'm not sure rigorous is correct, but otherwise, why the uproar? They could add, 'may be a tuner of from 0 to 50 years experience unwilling to submit his/her work to examination by his/her peers', would that be better? ----Dave New Orleans, RPT PS Geaux Tigers!!! On 9/2/06, Hechler Family quoth: > >Sounds discriminatory to me !!!!!!!!!!!!!! >* * >*?A Registered Piano Technician (RPT) has passed a series of rigorous >examinations on the maintenance, repair, and tuning of pianos. >* * >*?An Associate is a member who has not passed the RPT examinations.
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC