Jon writes: << Id say on average, I find that spongy feel in may 2 or 3 notes per handful of pianos, but mostly in Steinways...curiously. Anyway, as I mentioned, I found that slightly increasing the depth has helped when nothing else has.>> Inre aftertouch, increasing depth has much the same effect as raising hammer height. I believe that your occasional mushy note on a Steinway is due to manufacturing tolerances being so poorly controlled. Variables in these actions are due to the placement of the balance pin and/or capstan, the whimsical consistancy of the cove cuts on the flanges, poorly drilled action rails, knuckle placement and dimesions that are often no more than distantly related to their neighbors, keys with binding balance mortices, and all the other things that make this the "standard" piano of the world. If you are setting dip by direct measurement of the key depression, you also will have any key height variances added to the overall effect. I set dip by aftertouch priority method, and whereas the typical Yamaha, Kawai, Bose, Bech, etc. piano will have virtually the same key dip for identical aftertouch, the Steinways are all over the place. That is why on high level Steinway regulation, I find that the best feel comes when the inconsistancies are split between keydip and hammer blow. I allow a .008" variation in key dip before I raise or lower the hammer to achieve the same aftertouch. This leaves a hammer line and keydip that is slightly irregular, but an extemely close aftertouch consistancy. Artists are able to judge the consistancy of aftertouch a hell of a lot closer than they are to the actual amount of key travel, and their reaction to an aftertouch priority regulation has supported this. Regards, Ed Foote RPT http://www.uk-piano.org/edfoote/index.html www.uk-piano.org/edfoote/well_tempered_piano.html
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC