> Just to revisit this for a moment--on an RC&S board do you find a > significant tonal difference between a board loaded at 250 and one loaded at > 800 lbs? > > David Love That's a pretty wide range for one board type, and I suppose it depends on what is considered significant. I find a moderate bearing change makes some slight difference on an RC&S board, but a similar change is considerably more dramatic on a CC or RC and panel supported board. I think that's because because the spring rate doesn't change appreciably in the RC&S board as it's deflected, but it does in panel supported boards. Spring rate is, I think, key here. But then some of that could well be back scale length too, since I haven't made bridge position and plate modifications on anything but RC&S boards, I don't have direct comparisons. I also don't load RC&S boards lightly, or panel supported boards heavily in the first place, which complicates comparison. It goes back to what you said about balancing soundboard stiffness to the scale, with bearing load being a necessary component of the scale for soundboard design consideration, and spring rate is much less variable on a RC&S board after it's built and in the piano than in panel supported boards. This also means that the tonal character of panel supported boards will change more with humidity swings as varying panel compression levels change the spring rate. Ron N
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC