Stephane and Terry Hi you two. I have always adhered to the idea that ribs have had two primary functions. One has been to provide adequate support (which I believe can be eliminated at this point) and the other has been to deal with the problem of anisotropism. So if one can eliminate the need for crown/down bearing support then one can use ribs exclusively for the later. What I am wondering then is what this would allow the designer to do in terms of rib dimensions, number of ribs... etc. I'm looking for thoughts on those issues given an assumed total independence from any need to provide crown support. As for justification for the need to address anisotropism in itself I refer to the below from the 5 lectures. I think there has been a deal written on the subject elsewhere as well. From Wogram: "A stiffening of the soundboard would improve the sound radiation efficiency, as a stiff soundboard is less inclined to subdivide into small vibrating areas. One purpose of the ribs is precisely to stiffen the soundboard, which indeed is thin in proportion to its size. Another purpose is to "homogenize" the soundboard by equalizing the difference in bending stiffness (elasticity modulus) parallel to and across the grain. The moduli of elasticity in the two directions are in a ratio of approximately 20:1 (anisotropism). If this is not compensated for by the addition of ribs running across the grain, the effective vibrating area is reduced and the radiation efficiency is decreased over a broad frequency band." Cheers RicB Hi Ric. Same reaction here : why consider ribs if their role in supporting down bearing force is meant ? The only accepted theory for now is that (apart from sustaining the down bearing forces) the ribs help the sound wave traveling across the grain of the panel. Now, who said that this is important ? I believe that the panel (soundboard) must be under some compression to sound well. Same for strings : they must have some tension to sound well. I think this has to deal with some internal frictions in both cases. Do you think a board where the ribs sustain all of the down bearing forces, and a panel freely posed on these ribs, without bearing any force, would sound good ? My answer is not, but I never tried this at home. Best regards. Stéphane Collin. Hi Ric - I don't understand what you are asking. If a panel can support downbearing somehow, then why the concern regarding rib design? - you wouldn't need ribs presumably. I'm sure I'm missing something here..... Terry Farrell >I suppose most of the rebuilders are already on the road to Rochester... >but I thought I'd ask anyways.... > > Assuming for the moment that one could provide adequate and total support > for crown and down bearing completely independent of ribs in a standard > single ply panel.... what would the primary design considerations for ribs > be ? > > Cheers > RicB > >
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC