---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment Is the fork's inharmonicity what we are also comparing too? If so, how does this influance the direction of deviation? Andrew Anderson At 10:57 AM 1/9/2006, you wrote: >A small correction. Recently I have read: > >"Therefore, if you very accurately match the beat rates of F3-Fork and > F3-A4, you will tune A4 sharp every single time!" > >and >"If f3 a5 method is used with A5 as the coincident partial then A4 will be >sharp." > >Not meaning to embarrass anyone, but just to avoid confusion to >those learning the trade, this is not correct. A perfectly tuned 440 >A4 on the piano produces a second partial which is slightly sharp of >880. IF the fork produces 880 at A5 (which has recently been called >into question), we would have to bring A4 DOWN (under 440) to match >its 2nd partial to the fork's 2nd partial. > >Bob Davis ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/ad/8d/fa/4f/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC