Cracking the unisons

David Love davidlovepianos@comcast.net
Fri, 6 Jan 2006 17:41:21 -0800


I find the soft blow more accurate when listening, the firm blow better for
stability.  For me the process requires a mixture of both:  Tune firm, check
soft.  

David Love
davidlovepianos@comcast.net 

-----Original Message-----
From: pianotech-bounces@ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces@ptg.org] On Behalf
Of Don
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 7:32 PM
To: Pianotech
Subject: Re: Cracking the unisons

Hi Bernard,

The accutuner, so I am told, does not use this method of pitch
measurement.(FFT)

Why do you believe that "firm blow" tuning is less accurate than "soft
tuning"?

At least one technician I know listens to the very beginnings of the
sound--and uses the information his ear (or tuning device?) gathers during
this "prompt" phase to tune the piano.

As to accuracy it is 0.015 not 0.1 of a cent.


At 01:40 AM 1/7/2006 +0100, you wrote:
>Most?modern ETD?s are doing fast fourier transformation (FFT)?for pitch 
>calculation.

>A good?aural tuner tune with a firm struck,?to catch also the transient
phase 
>of the sound at higher volumes. Low volume tuning is like not voicing the 
>left pedal, it leaves?the transient phase untuned. But sometimes it may 
>happen, that the pianist also use volumes above mp...

>In some ETD manuals you find sometimes statements of "0.1 Hz accuracy"



Regards,
Don Rose, B.Mus., A.M.U.S., A.MUS., R.P.T.
Non calor sed umor est qui nobis incommodat

mailto:pianotuna@yahoo.com	http://us.geocities.com/drpt1948/

3004 Grant Rd. REGINA, SK, S4S 5G7
306-539-0716 or 1-888-29t-uner

_______________________________________________
pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives



This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC