Question

[Avery]

Richard,

I usually do, also. That's how I noticed both addresses in the 'To:' 
line which caused the question. Just as in your message, so you 
should get two of these. One personal and one to the list.

David, I understand the 'reply to all' thing but I only (usually 
always) did only the 'reply' thing.
The senders address as well as the list address came up on the To: line.

Maybe when the sender sends the post, he puts both addresses on the 
To: line? Hey, nothing earth shattering here. I was just wondering. :-)

Avery

At 06:30 PM 4/12/2006, you wrote:
>I have gotten into the habit checking the address that comes up when 
>I hit the reply button.  If I intend a personal response, and the 
>list's address shows up, then I delete it and retrieve the personal 
>address from elsewhere in the email.  Doesn't take much additional 
>time, just a way of thinking that I choose to believe is important.
>
>Richard
>
>----- Original Message ----
>From: Philippe Errembault <phil.errembault at skynet.be>
>To: Pianotech List <pianotech at ptg.org>
>Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 4:43:27 PM
>Subject: Re: Question
>
>No David, Avery is right...
>
>Avery,
>
>I'm not sure about the precise reason, because I don't have all the
>information needed to answer that, but it's probably because of a
>combination of reasons :
>hen you send a mail, it is accompagned with a header which contains a few
>information tags : who sent it, to whom, the subject, the date, which
>server(s) it did pass by, antispam reports, etc...the [From] tag is
>especially important, because it defines to whom the reply will be adressed.
>But you need to be able to overide this, of you want a reply to your mail to
>be sent to another address. an example of such a need is in a mailing list,
>when you reply to it,you send you reply, not to the sender of the message to
>which you reply, but to the mailing list, itself. Now, on your mail client,
>there usually exist a possibility to set this reply-to field, which will
>make no difference if it is set to the same adress than your [from] address,
>except if you're writing to a mailing list which adds itself to the reply-to
>field instead of replacing it.
>
>Then the behaviour of this will depend on how your mail program is
>configured, and probably also on which mail program you use.
>
>Philippe
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Porritt, David" <dporritt at mail.smu.edu>
>To: "Pianotech List" <pianotech at ptg.org>
>Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 11:52 PM
>Subject: RE: Question
>
>
>Avery:
>
>I think it has more to do with whether you click the "reply" button or the
>"reply to all" button.
>
>dp
>
>__________________________
>David M. Porritt, RPT
>Meadows School of the Arts
>Southern Methodist University
>Dallas, TX 75275
>dporritt at smu.edu
>
>________________________________
>
>From: pianotech-bounces at ptg.org on behalf of Avery
>Sent: Wed 4/12/2006 4:15 PM
>To: Pianotech List
>Subject: Question
>
>
>
>I'm curious. Why do people set up their e-mail so any response to the
>comments
>to the list go to them AND the list? Do they really need 2 responses to
>their
>posts? :-)
>
>I've seen two like that today. Just wondering.
>
>Avery Todd, RPT
>University of Houston