Grotrian Steinwegs - to list or not to list?

Michael Gamble michael@gambles.fsnet.co.uk
Sun, 25 Sep 2005 20:16:02 +0100


Good point, RicB
I'll weave in a temporary bit of cloth to relish the difference. Let y'all
know. I must say the piano sounds much, much brighter - and bigger, somehow.
Eventually I'll get some of Andre's Wurzens as well. But enough for now!
Regards
Michael G.(UK)

-----Original Message-----
From: Ric Brekne [mailto:ricbrek@broadpark.no] 
Sent: 25 September 2005 14:11
To: pianotech
Subject: Grotrian Steinwegs - to list or not to list?

The length of the backscale, plus the other unmuted non singing lengths, 
plus the fact that the entire backscale of these instruments is unmuted 
yeilds a very predominant sizzle sound into the entire sound mix. Not my 
favorite sound personally. Sort of sound like one of those rivetet 
cymbals. Otherwise I've always found Grotrians to be lacking something 
I've never really been able to put my finger on.  Nicely made 
instruments I suppose, but nothing there that grabs you and moves the 
earth under your feet.

jmt
RicB

-------------

That is indeed "the question" Whether 'tis required in the back-scale of my
S&S 'A' or not. The photos attached shew some interesting aspects of this
very nice Grotrian. The wrest pins are nickle plated, the "aliquot" bar is
continuous - unlike the S&S where it is "stepped"-per-note and the lack of
Listing Cloth in the back scale - except for the covered string back-scale.
Any helpful comments out there?
Regards
Michael G.(UK)          






This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC