DAG vs. 1708

William R. Monroe pianotech@a440piano.net
Sat, 26 Mar 2005 09:09:52 -0600


Terry,

Sooooo, no surface dressing on your bridges?  How finely sanded?  You find
it eliminates the need for DAG or the like?

Respectfully,
William R. Monroe




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Terry" <terry@farrellpiano.com>
To: "Pianotech" <pianotech@ptg.org>
Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 4:55 AM
Subject: Re: DAG vs. 1708


> I use finely-sanded perfectly quarter sawn hard maple. Amazingly
lubricious!
>
> Terry Farrell
>
>
> >          I've used the 1708 and like it. Seems a bit more slippery.
> >
> > Greg
>
> > >Any preferences out there on using DAG vs. Using McLube 1708 on
bridges?
> > >I've not tried 1708, but am considering it.  Curious if there is
anything
> > >outstanding about either product.
> > >
> > >Respectfully,
> > >William R. Monroe
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives
>
>



This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC