climbing mt Everett

[David Ilvedson]

This is a multipart message in MIME format

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
It's only a little joke between Ron and I...me the string seater=
 and he the non-string seater.   

David I.







Original message
From: Farrell 
To: Pianotech 
Received: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 07:17:13 -0400
Subject: Re: climbing mt Everett


David, did you mean sit butt or seat string? 
 
Again, I don't think Ron is trying to be a jokester. 
 
Here, look at me:     :-|     Or am I just that slow?
 
I think Ron's point is that string seating is likely of little if=
 any benefit (at least long term) to false beat reduction. If you=
 isolate the two procedures, you can better evaluate how each=
 procedure affects the outcome. Perhaps a similar benefit will=
 occur from CA application alone.
 
Terry Farrell          ;-)


> No, no Joe don't do that...seat, then the CA...;-]
> 
> David I.
> 
>>> Hi all,
>>> Today marked the taming of one of the worst false beating=
 pianos, an 
>>> Everett console.
>>> No unison from C5 to the top had any single string without a=
 real shudder
>>> when the unison was tuned. To liken it to a Calliope would=
 insult that 
>>> instrument,
>>> With the help of my tipper, string seater, and two passes=
 with CA the 
>>> unisons are now clear and strong,
>>> I was not supprised to find that after seating the upper=
 treble was 
>>> flat, but after the CA was applied, a little sharp. This=
 seems to happen 
>>> regurally when I do the CA thing on false beats.
> 
> 
>>Joe,
>>Next time, in the interest of education, try the CA without=
 seating 
>>anything and see what you get.
>>Ron N 


---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/e6/a0/f2/2b/attachment.htm

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--