Yes, David - please keep us posted. I have been waiting to hear the latest and how S&S dealt with the rolled bridge problem. It's like taking delivery of a new Rolls Royce - then finding there's a Wankel engine in it! This is a classic example of getting the true answer from S&S. Finding the answer is one thing though. How S&S properly deal with it is another - and this latter is what I would like to find out! Michael G.(UK) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Farrell" <mfarrel2@tampabay.rr.com> To: "Pianotech" <pianotech@ptg.org> Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 6:04 PM Subject: Re: Steinway d-rolled bridge saga- report > Indeed, please do. Little doubt a number of us would be interested to see > a response. I would certainly be among them. > > This passage, in particular, struck me: > > "Theoretically, there should be positive front > and back bearing. However, pianos seldom conform to > the theoretically correct." > > Interesting.... > > Terry Farrell > > >> David: >> >> I didn't see any responses to this email. Do keep us posted on how this >> comes out. >> >> David M. Porritt >> dporritt@smu.edu > > >
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC