---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment At 02:20 PM 8/1/2005, you wrote: >Cy, > >Maybe I'm wrong, but as far as I understand, Dan's postings about the >duplex thing >has nothing to do with the Bluthner! Am I wrong? No. HG >Avery > >At 01:31 PM 8/1/05, you wrote: >>Michael Gamble posted the same thing. I wondered that no one else picked >>up on this... (Duplex Dan Franklin, we miss you!). >> >>--Cy-- >>----- Original Message ----- >>From: <mailto:mfarrel2@tampabay.rr.com>Farrell >>To: <mailto:pianotech@ptg.org>Pianotech >>Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 2:27 PM >>Subject: Re: Bluthner Tuning >>I had someone reply to me privately on this subject. He suggested >>something that no one else had mentioned. >> >>"...there are two sections with the extra string. in the lower section >>you tune the fourth string an octave higher than the notes to which they >>correspond and in the upper section you tune the extra strings in unison >>to the strings below." >> >>This information reportedly came from a Bluthner dealer. I'd sure hate to >>be wrong and start breaking strings. Anyone else ever hear of this? Is >>there any possibility that there were different scales that were tuned >>differently? >> >>Terry Farrell ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/8f/41/ca/fc/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC