> Great, another data collector! Good. > I think the feeler gage check is only going to be effective if there is a > fairly large length of the string that is above the cap (such as if the > string is entirely off the cap and only touching at the pins) so that there > is room to get the gage in. This is the only case that counts, isn't it? If the string is in contact with the cap anywhere, it is still on the cap and not up the pins. >For strings that are above the cap only > locally at the pins then we may need to come up with a different means of > measurement, such as the dial indicator you mention below. We have one, or at least an indicator. Seating the string at the pin can produce a visible movement, an audible sound, and a measurable drop in pitch, even after the feeler gage (or whatever) shows the string in contact with the center of the cap. I kind of like the dial indicator idea to test this. Setting one indicator on a suspect string, centered between pin rows, and another on the speaking length, as close to the bridge pin as possible, take readings, seat the string at the bridge, and take another pair of readings to see what moved where, and how much. I plan to try this before tear down on the next piano in. Maybe it will produce something meaningful to some of us - maybe not. If you guys come up with something, please let us know. Ron N
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC