---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment Matthew, The easiest piano to tune is a concert grand 9' or more. The hardest, one of the little wurli spinet monsters where the lid just clear the top of the sharps. Good luck finding an easy one. ;-) Andrew At 11:13 AM 9/29/2004 -0700, you wrote: >Thanks for the replies. I am practicing my tuning on a 1913 Hinze >upright. Is that doing me more harm than good here? I think it is hard >to hear lots of stuff on that piano, but then again, I am a beginner, so I >don't know if it's more the piano or more me not having trained ears >yet. I know lots of families with much newer pianos, should I try to hook >up with one of them and maybe work it out with them to practice my tuning >on it? > >Matthew > >BobDavis88@aol.com wrote: >Matthew writes: >When I tune the temperament octave (A3-A4), it needs to be a 4:2 octave, >correct? > >No. Read the many replies which said that it should usually be wider than >that. >And one way to test this octave is to play the A two octaves above the >lower note as the test key, to hear the partials in the octave, am I right? > >Not exactly, but read Don Rose's comments on ghosting. > If the octave you are testing has no beat whatsoever, you have a > perfect temperament octave, is this true? > >No. There is no such thing as a beatless octave. An octave which is not >beating at one level, such as 4:2, will be beating at all other coincident >partials, such as 2:1, 6:3, 8:4. The higher the beatless coincident is in >the chain, the wider the octave. A good compromise octave is usually >pretty quiet, though, > >Matthew, > >If you have kept this trail of posts on octave tuning, please go back and >re-read it, and the links to which you were referred, including the ones >to the AccuTuner manual Appendices F and H. People are happy to spend time >helping you, but you've got to do your homework and read the replies. At >the risk of repetition, I include, directly below, a copy of my post from >last week on this subject: >Bob Davis >------------- >Matthew's original question was how to tune a 4:2 octave. Several people, >myself included, sent the tests, aural and visual. Whether that [meaning >4:2] is appropriate for the temperament octave on a particular piano is a >second question. Tuning so that "the 10th is just noticeably faster than >the third" might produce a good width of octave, but it is NOT a 4:2. >[It's wider] > >A clean 4:2 octave IS wide at 2:1, and narrow at 6:3. Most aural tuners >naturally gravitate towards a temperament octave that is very slightly >wide of 4:2 ("the 10th is just noticeably faster than the third"), which >will be substantially wide of 2:1 and a tiny narrow of 6:3. This gives an >octave that is pretty clean-sounding, and produces fifths which are pretty >clean and fourths that aren't too trashy. Any octave size can be divided >into 12 equal half steps. A true 4:2 octave will produce cleaner fourths >and more movement in the fifths, and on most pianos will be unnecessarily >narow. However, on some pianos with high inharmonicity, a wide temperament >octave added to a clean octave below, will produce a double octave that is >too noisy. It's a balancing act. > > >Do you Yahoo!? ><http://vote.yahoo.com>vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today! ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/9c/b9/18/f7/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC