(OT) Re: Bullhockey was Tax...

Richard Brekne Richard.Brekne@grieg.uib.no
Sat, 25 Sep 2004 10:14:49 +0100


Grin...again...

>> There are a lot of statements below! Could you please be more 
>> specific with "Bull hockey"? And also tell  your reasons for 
>> answering. Your opinion is valued. Rich
>

Richard. "Bull hockey" is one of those most misunderstood of phrases in 
the western world. It actually relates to a sport in southern Argentina 
that is a spinoff of Spainish Bull Fights. Social awarenesss of the 
brutal nature of the later is not as new a thing as many might think 
really, and in the 1850 the Argentines began to develope this sport. 
Essentially two bulls are secured to each their iron ball and chain.  
These are fastened with a specially contrived belt that circumfrances 
the Bulls proximal parts just fores of the hind legs, with a 3 meter  
chain attached to a 5 kilo ball.  There are two <<Matadors>> in the game 
as well and two goals which consist of a 4 by 3 meter wooden wall. The 
object is for the Matadors to somehow stimulate the bulls come into a 
position so as to make the ball come in contact with the front side of 
the wall.

The Bulls are understandably upset about the uncomfortable nature of 
their circumstances mind you,  what with belt and all. Not to mention 
there are two of them in the same ring.  The Matadors are naturally 
enough, quite anxious about their safety, being equipped with only a 
fancy suit and a red flag on a 1 meter stick.  The ensueing confusion is 
so propundant that crowds are often left in disparage as to whether they 
are to laugh or cheer.  The riduculousness of the sport spawned 
associations which have seeped down through history and across cultural 
borders, hence the modern english (American) term <<Bull Hockey>>

Hope this helps

>> Richard Oliver Snelson
>
RicB

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC