Outdated Information ... Was Laptops vs ETD's

[Richard Brekne]

Randy was no doubt speaking to the origional TL97 Alan.  And he is 
rather correct in his assessment... and personally I found that to be 
one of the absolute most attractive features of 97.  Let it be said that 
once you get clearly into your head just how to "manipulate the data 
manually" then 97 becomes just as quick and effective in use as any 
other machine.  And since this relates so very very closely to what an 
aural tuner should conciously understand very very clearly,  97 quickly 
reveals itself as a valuable self teaching tool as well. 

That said... you are absolutely correct in the rest of what you say. 
Tunelab Pro and Pocket are evolved programs and can very easily compare 
with CyberTuner at a fraction of the cost.

Cheers
RicB

Cheers
RicB


Alan wrote:

>Something Randy Potter said in a conference class didn't make sense to me at
>the time and I never really followed up on it. Then I read a post here that
>said "Tunelab requires that you make a judgment about how you wish to do the
>stretch and then manipulate the data manually."
>
>This is most emphatically not correct.
>
>Tunelab has evolved, but apparently the word has not gotten out. It is a
>powerful, fully-featured, really nifty program IMHO. I've used it for a
>couple of years (on an iPAQ Pocket PC). 
>
>  
>