---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment =20 Conrad Thanks for the unusually political post. It's always more personal when=20 you & others especially Military folks are on the recieving end of the kin= ds=20 of actions & words being discussed here in regards to J.F.Kerry. I've been hearing that his picture is in the Vietnamese Museum as a hero= =20 so I guess they like him for being a patriot there as well as some do here. Thanks for your service to this country. Dale At 17:38 10/28/2004, you wrote: >If you know something about John Kerry being a traitor you should report >him--and soon. He may be elected President. It is a crime, afterall, >and I'm sure Mr. Ashcroft would want to look at your hard evidence. >Don't hold back, Carl, do your duty. Withholding evidence of capital >crime might just be a crime itself--especially one as serious as >treason. > >David Love >davidlovepianos@comcast.net David, Speaking out politically is WAY different than my norm, and the way this=20 eternal campaign has polarised the country will probably lose me some=20 friends on this list, but I feel I must - please indulge me this last time. I'm not Carl, but _I_ do not need to check websites to determine Kerry's =20 culpability, but I may dig into my old seabag, pull out my Bluejacket's =20 Manual and rely on my first hand experience of the effects of Kerry. If you really still trust websites at this point, perhaps you should=20 re-read Kerry's own words during his Senate testimony, and also afterwards,= =20 where he admits participating in the same atrocities which he said were=20 happening. Or... did he say he was just reporting what other vets had told= =20 him. Oh... that's right... he said both. Which version was purgery? Since I was in the area at the time (Tonkin Gulf) and in the same=20 organization (US Navy '67-'73) and trying to live under the same rules=20 (UCMJ) [Uniform Code of Military Justice], let me try to help you with you=20 some of the military rules with regard to his traitorous activities. Whilst Kerry was still a commissioned officer and ostensibly bound by the=20 UCMJ, he visited with members of the Viet Cong in Paris. How a Lieutenant=20 (Paygrade O-2or3 -- i.e. next to the bottom of officer ranks since Ensign=20 was routinely skipped) thought he could effect peace, who knows? However,=20 there is a term called "consorting with the enemy". In a war, the idea=20 generally is that, if you meet an enemy, you do all you can to kill him.=20 It's brutal, but that IS what war IS. {Note to Bill Clinton - there's that=20 word again} As an officer, it is your sworn DUTY to do that and lead =20 others to do the same. You don't generally sit down to croissants and =20 caviar with the enemy unless you are a general, admiral or head of =20 state. Money talks, I suppose, as Saddam knew in his dealings with the=20 same multiple UN members which Kerry thinks he'd get as allies. I recall several times in my military career having these things drilled=20 into my head, so I don't need to consult a website to tell me that, if I as= =20 a 2nd class petty officer (only E-5 or middle of non-commissioned officers,= =20 having turned down E-6 opportunities to return to civilian life) had done=20 the same thing, I would still be in Fort Leavenworth for it, if not in an=20 unmarked grave. How good was he for the morale of troops/sailors in those years? He=20 certainly didn't make any points with me or my shipmates. In the spring of= =20 1970, when my ship got back from it's tour of duty in the war zone - with=20 _IT'S_ current mission accomplished and signs celebrating that fact - I did= =20 a lot of traveling around southern and, later, northern California. I went= =20 to concerts at Dorothy Chandler Pavilion (free or at a discount), =20 hitchhiked, went to movies and church and got invited into strangers homes =20 for home cooked meals, even got some dates after those meals. ALL WHILE IN= =20 UNIFORM. In the fall of 1972, when I got back from my second WestPac "cruise",=20 sailors were, by that time, again allowed to grow beards and have (even=20 encouraged to have) civilian clothes onboard and allowed (even encouraged)=20 to go on "liberty" in civvies. WHY? Because, by then, people were=20 shouting the "baby killer' and other phrases which Kerry had made so=20 popular in 1971. Being IN DANGER while wearing your uniform IN YOUR OWN COUNTRY is NOT good=20 for morale! Having a long hair wig to escape military haircut detection, =20 and getting spat upon for defending your country is NOT good for morale (I =20 did and I was)! _Trust me_, not some New York Times/CBS fabrifacts. It= =20 took me 20 years before I felt comfortable even joining the VFW. I lay=20 that sputum in my face directly on Kerry's doorstep. His statements were=20 not a little over the top. They were slanderous and self-incriminating, if= =20 you could believe any of them. They were certainly demoralising, and a=20 comfort to the enemy, whether true or not. The soldiers/sailors/marines in Iraq do NOT want a POTUS/CIC (President of=20 the US /Commander in Chief) who is against what they are doing in the first= =20 place. Kerry would have the same benefit to military morale in 2005 as he=20 did in 1971. Voting to approve military action and then voting against support for the=20 same action does not instill a feeling of comfort among those who depend on= =20 that support for their lives, either. My 10=A2. Conrad Hoffsommer -Former Machinist's Mate 2nd Class - USN -Nuclear power plant operator aboard USS Long Beach (CGN-9) 1970-73 Yup, it's personal. over and out. =20 ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/80/cf/46/fc/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC