Soft blows (was How we hear) or hard blows.

Avery Todd avery@ev1.net
Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:35:18 -0500


---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
Hi Andre,

I think the problem here is confusing tuning softly as opposed to giving a
test blow to make sure it stays. Right?

Avery

At 12:36 PM 10/26/04, you wrote:
>Just a few things here :
>First of all, I tried to tell here that when we strike a note very hard,=20
>the emphasis lies on the higher partials. I have tried this out on my ETD=
=20
>partial analysis, and indeed it shows that the higher partials are more=20
>present with this hard blow.
>This causes us to listen to strings in a different way and the result we=20
>may find in the unisons : hitting the strings with a not so hard blow will=
=20
>result in a more coarse, more rich sound.
>Hitting the strings very hard will result in a unison which sounds thin,=20
>rather short in length and unsatisfactory.
>Basically we can hear a real difference if we hit VERY hard, like what=20
>concert tuners do daily, or just less hard but still in a firm manner.
>The last one requires a very good tuning technique and it definitely=20
>requires from the tuner to put his hammer ALWAYS into the direction of the=
=20
>tail in the very first place.
>
>second : we should not confuse hard or soft blows with the way we listen=20
>to, and perceive, piano sounds.
>A hard or softer blow literally defines - more or less - the presence of=20
>higher or lower overtones.
>The way we perceive piano sounds, and the way we choose to enrich and=20
>power our unisons defines the difference between piano tuners in general.
>The example I gave here of a technician working on a beautiful concert=20
>grand, who made ugly (to my ears!) unisons, shows that indeed your unison=
=20
>is not necessarily my unison.
>
>After my initial ear opening experience, I often experimented with=20
>colleagues on the very same instrument, just to find out whether their=20
>'tone' was different from mine, and indeed, the unisons I re-tuned sounded=
=20
>completely different.
>
>Lastly : to those who tried out the hard versus soft blow but had no=20
>result, I say this :
>The best 'place' on a piano to try this out, is in the first treble=20
>section, just next (on right of)  to the wound bass strings.
>This section is usually very sonorous  and rich sounding.
>Just take one unison and re-rune it, but this time with tremendous blows,=
=20
>as if your life depends on it, just like the professional life of a=20
>concert tuner who depends on his rock steady unisons ok? If you do this,=20
>you will clearly hear a difference between this one unison and the=20
>adjacent unisons.
>
>It is my personal experience, that tuning technique is far more important=
=20
>than being able to make the most refined temperament.
>It is for that reason only that in one of the very best Piano Academies=20
>(Hamamatsu) in the world, the young students learn to master tuning=20
>technique first by doing pitch raise and pitch lowering ALL DAY long for=20
>three Months (wow), and with the aid of a tuning machine. The result of=20
>EVERY tuning is scribbled on a chalk board in the central hall, for=20
>everybody to see, openly or sneakily. Showing their bad marks drives the=20
>students to the edge of their abilities, and this usually results in=20
>already having quite a decent tuning technique after those three Months.
>The next course is learning about temperament, but this time without=20
>machines, and after one year, they are often just as good (or much better=
=20
>even) than a tuner from our hemisphere who has already worked quite a=20
>number of years.
>That's one of the main reasons, why I, after having fought with piano's=20
>for the better part of my professional life, put the emphasis on=20
>technique, and please with the aid of one of the best ETD's. I can=20
>concentrate fully on technique, and on making 'tone'.
>BTW.... If someone here prefers to not use an ETD, than I have no=20
>objections to that at all. How could I? and why should I? It is=20
>everybody's personal choice, and I truly understand the love and=20
>dedication of making a very beautiful aural tuning.
>I have had more than my share, that's why I choose for what I chose.
>
>Andr=E9 Oorebeek
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>On 26-okt-04, at 18:26, jason kanter wrote:
>
>>One of the very first basics we learn is that we must set the pin with a=
=20
>>firm blow to equalize the string tension across the friction points. How=
=20
>>does this relate to the current discussion of using rather soft blows to=
=20
>>tune unisons? I *imagine* that you tune with soft blows, then settle the=
=20
>>pin with a hard blow, then listen again with soft blow to ensure the=20
>>tuning has not moved? But the hard blow has likely changed the tuning, so=
=20
>>... do you use soft blows while raising the pitch, then lowering it to a=
=20
>>smidgeon sharp, then apply a firm blow to settle the string into exactly=
=20
>>the right spot? If we avoid hard blows entirely, surely the piano will be=
=20
>>immediately put out of tune by the pianist?
>>
>>Puzzled in Seattle
>>| |   | | |   | |   | | |   | |   | | |   | |   | | |   | |   | | |   |=20
>>|   | | |   | |
>>Jason Kanter . piano tuning regulation repair
>>jkanter@rollingball.com . cell 425 830 1561
>>serving the eastside and the san juans
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: pianotech-bounces@ptg.org=20
>>[<mailto:pianotech-bounces@ptg.org>mailto:pianotech-bounces@ptg.org]On=20
>>Behalf Of Quentin Codevelle
>>Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 9:32 PM
>>To: pianotech
>>Subject: How we hear to Jeneetah
>>
>>Hi,
>>
>>Maybe you should keep on making soft blows, but try to hit the key=20
>>quickly, without listening to the note during 15 sec like you said.
>>That way you'll be able to hear the "attack" of the note, the first stage=
=20
>>of the sound that is produced.
>>Having a clear and pure sounding attack is very important for me, and=20
>>I've never succeeded in having a clear attack when tuning with listening=
=20
>>to the note more than 2 or 3 seconds.
>>
>>For me, when I tune, when my attack is clear, the rest is also, and my=20
>>unisson has enough "length" most of times.
>>I need much concentration right now to make clean unissons on every note=
=20
>>with this technique, that means it takes some time to have a good eveness.
>>But since the beginning, you should hear a difference, YOUR sound will be=
=20
>>turning from black to white.
>>
>>Andre?
>>
>>Quentin.
>friendly greetings
>from
>Andr=E9 Oorebeek
>
>"where Music is, no harm can be"
>
></blockquote></x-html>

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/06/10/01/a5/attachment.htm

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--


This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC