Hi, I have enjoyed reading everyone's response on this matter, but I just wanted to say I particularly appreciate the response from David Anderson and Ron Koval. I have been reading so many posts on this list about various tuning methods deliberately based on partials and I have never even consciously thought about them - I just tune what I think sounds good (overly-simplified description) :), or perhaps, the "whole tone" as it was put. So it's nice to hear from others who tune in what I would say a more natural way. Though not to dismiss my genuine interest in hearing other people's tuning methods. - John > Ahhhh, the whole sound---the "natural note that the player hears"--- > It's so wacky that tuners say you can't tune this way, or that the only > "real" way to tune is to listen to partials, or overtones. Your body is > capable of integrating and processing the subtle harmonic differences > from piano to piano and note to note or section to section in a much > more > precise and nuanced way than a machine or---flame suit on---than a > mechanistic, linear process called partial matching. IMO. > > Making a piano sing is the goal of every tuner; I can do that much, > much > easier listening to the whole tone---the note as the artist and > listener > hear it. > > Best, > > David Andersen
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC