This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment Dear Joe, You may use the new Mensurix 5 with the built in physical modeling of = the hammer/string interaction for the inspection of the strike points. = Especially in the Pro Version there is a strike point optimizer that = calculates a predefined amount of strike points (typically about 30-50) = and reports the results on a graph with loudness against the different = strike point lengths. What can be found by this simulations, is that the = optimal strike line is not on a geometric line. There are more or less = several points that have a nearly constant size measured from te = agraffe, where beyond them the loudness will decrease rapidly and = increase slowly again (but always less than the precedent maximum). The = first maximum distance is about 3 milimeters away from the agraffe (the = exact value depend most on hammer mass and string tension and to some = amount of the hammer stiffness). This first short distance can be used = only for the last hammers in the treble depending on the construction of = the instrument (agraffes on a grand etc) and and the size and shape of = the hammers. As a consequence of these results to keep a constant hammer shank = length, (for an equal strike weight and touch weight) the bridge side = termination must be rearranged also, what is only possible in the = construction of a new instrument or by restringing/recapping of the = bridge. It would me not astonish to find out that the constructors of = the old first class instruments of the last century had covered such = breaks (which they may have found by experiments) into the offsets at = the iron frame breaks. Regards, Bernhard You may download a free demo of the Mensurix 5 at: http://www.piano-stopper.de/dl/Mensurix_5.0.10.msi ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Joe Garrett=20 To: pianotech=20 Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 4:36 AM Subject: Strike Point Over the years, I've experimented and studied the various = recommendations for Strike Point. None seem to, truly satisfy me. I'd = like to hear anyone's preferences, on the subject. What prompted this, = is: I just recently had a New Key Set made, that esstablishe a new = balance point, etc. In the process, the maker, (not to be named), threw = out the old action rails, etc., from the original, (1860's Chickering, = parallel strung, 8 footer.)! Yikes! Unfortunately, he did this with the = owners say-so, instead of consulting me! Damn! Anyway, I'm going to be = re-establishing the strike points and think some feed-back from y'all = would put my mind, a bit more at ease. (well....maybe not, knowing you = guys/gals!<G>) Any info would be appreciated.=20 Best Regards, Joe Garrett, R.P.T. Captain, Tool Police Squares R I ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/a9/2c/67/45/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC