> This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment > Sheesh! This is an archaic technique that should be put out of it's miser= y! > Enough already! Please????? > Just BUY some more mutes Mr. Cheapskate!<G> Dude----maybe YOU are an archaic old poophead that needs to be put out of its(his?) misery...<g> Bottom line is this: I tune this way because I like to---a lot--- and because it makes my tuning better, and because THAT makes me more money. I= f other people are interested in this old-school protocol, great. If not, great. I think my tuning sounds better than any other tuning I=B9ve heard live, with the exception of a piano I heard that was prepared by Eric Schandall. I love it, my clients love it, it takes about the same time as alla y=B9all=B9s tuning---it=B9s all good. I=B9m not advocating wholesale migration to the technique; I=B9m just keeping it alive because, for me, it makes the pianos sound so beautiful, and it=B9s big fun for me. Actually, today I tuned an old, worn-out Steinway on the stage of the Hollywood Palladium. I went from start to finish in 47 minutes; it started out about 2 cents low (average) and ended up on pitch. I do a real, real close pitch raise in 20-25 minutes. I=B9m a good dancer, and I like making macaroni and cheese. Best to all.... David Andersen ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/b5/93/41/0f/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC