Electronic pitch source

Elwood Doss, Jr. edoss@utm.edu
Sun, 13 Jun 2004 12:46:46 -0500


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
I use the Sanderson Accufork and am pleased with it.  As long as it is co=
rrect, I don't see a problem with it.  I like the fact that it sustains t=
he pitch without having to hold it.  Along those lines I had tried to fin=
d the Tuning fork that is installed on a box that has a plunger that one =
activates to create the pitch.  Eliminates having to have three hands.  I=
 was never able to find one--they were permanently out of stock at the su=
pply houses when I tried to order it.  If anyone has one they would like =
to sell, please let me know.  If I had one, I would use it.

Joy!
Elwood

Elwood Doss, Jr., RPT
Piano Technician/Technical Director
Department of Music
106 Fine Arts Building
University of Tennessee at Martin
Martin, TN  38238
731-587-1152
  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: David West=20
  To: pianotech@ptg.org=20
  Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 7:40 PM
  Subject: Electronic pitch source


  Hi folks,
  Is there many of you that use an electronic pitch source vs. tuning for=
k?  If so, any recommendations?  Or is it best to stay with the tried and=
 true fork?

  Thanks in advance
  David West
  Roscoe IL.
  Madison Wi. Chapter
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/bc/4d/ff/7d/attachment.htm

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC