I thought Richard did "something" along the lines of a magnetic action. Am I wrong? Avery At 08:43 AM 12/29/04, you wrote: >Hi Richard, > >My understanding was that the magnetic action was one step further than >Stanwoodization. I.e. Stanwood *plus* more. > >At 07:18 PM 29/12/2004 +0100, you wrote: > >Don wrote: > > > >>Hi, > >> > >>Why not retro fit it with the magnetic type action--that way you will be > >>able to "dial up" what the player wants. > >> > >> > >> > > > >I would not advise this at all. I'm really opposed to the whole idea of > >so called adjustable touchweight systems. These typically do not really > >adjust anything but static touchweight, and the resulting touch > >characteristics are really unknown quantities that havent been all that > >closely looked at yet. > > > >Find a BW and ratio that provide the basic touch characteristics you > >feel with best provide pianists what they are after, and execute that in > >an action rebuild, remembering that physical touchweight is inextricably > >tied to voicing concerns. > > > >Cheers > >RicB > > > > > >> > >>Regards, > >>Don Rose, B.Mus., A.M.U.S., A.MUS., R.P.T. > >>Non calor sed umor est qui nobis incommodat > >> > >>mailto:pianotuna@accesscomm.ca > http://us.geocities.com/drpt1948/ > >> > >>3004 Grant Rd. REGINA, SK, S4S 5G7 > >>306-352-3620 or 1-888-29t-uner > >>_______________________________________________ > >>pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives > >> > >> > >> > > > >_______________________________________________ > >pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives > > > > > >Regards, >Don Rose, B.Mus., A.M.U.S., A.MUS., R.P.T. >Non calor sed umor est qui nobis incommodat > >mailto:pianotuna@accesscomm.ca http://us.geocities.com/drpt1948/ > >3004 Grant Rd. REGINA, SK, S4S 5G7 >306-352-3620 or 1-888-29t-uner >_______________________________________________ >pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC